Title

Jet eccentricity: A misleading source of agreement between doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Abstract

Characterization of the severity of aortic stenosis relies on accurate measurement of the pressure gradient across the valve and the valve area. Pressure gradients measured by Doppler ultrasound based on the clinical form of the Bernoulli equation often overestimate pressure gradients by catheter as the result of pressure recovery. Doppler techniques measure the velocity of the vena contracta of the stenotic jet. This corresponds to the maximal pressure gradient and the minimal effective valve area. Pressure recovery can be characterized by analysis of the spread of the stenotic jet downstream of the valve as it fills the aorta and should be influenced by the shape of the velocity profile of the decaying jet. In this study, we addressed the hypothesis that the site of complete pressure recovery (the point at which the jet fully expands to the size of the aorta), the effective valve area, and the maximal pressure gradient are affected by jet eccentricity. To accomplish this, we developed a computational model of aortic stenosis that provides detailed velocity and pressure information in the vicinity of the valve. The results show that the width of the eccentric wall jet decreased and maximal velocity increased with greater jet eccentricity. Furthermore, for a constant anatomic area, the effective valve area decreased, the distance to complete pressure recovery increased, and the maximal pressure gradient increased with the degree of eccentricity. Failure to take this into account could fortuitously drive Doppler and catheter measurements toward agreement because the distal pressure sensor will not record the fully recovered pressure. Therefore the pressure gradient across a stenotic valve depends on jet eccentricity. The spread of the wall jet after attachment must be characterized to develop a robust method for the prediction of pressure recovery. © Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

First Page

853

Last Page

862

DOI

10.1067/mje.2001.113648

Publication Date

1-1-2001

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS