American College of Lifestyle Medicine Expert Consensus Statement: Lifestyle Medicine for Optimal Outcomes in Primary Care
Authors
Meagan L. Grega, St. Luke's University Health Network, Easton, PA, USA
Jennifer T. Shalz, Lifestyle Medicine Department, St. Luke’s Health System, Boise ID, USA
Richard M. Rosenfeld, Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Health Science University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
Josie H. Bidwell, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MI, USA
Jonathan P. Bonnet, Palo Alto VA Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Medicine and Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
David Bowman, Department of Pediatrics, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; Lifestyle Med Revolution, LLC, Upper Marlboro, MD, USA
Melanie L. Brown, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Mollie E. Dwivedi, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Washington University Living Well Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
Ngozi M. Ezinwa, Loma Linda University Health Care, Redlands, CA, USA
John H. Kelly, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA; Lifestyle Health Education Inc., Rocky Mount, VA, USA
Amy R. Mechley, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Lawrence A. Miller, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Rajiv K. Misquitta, Department of Lifestyle Medicine, The Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, CA, USA
Michael D. Parkinson, P3 Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Dipak Patel, Community Health Center, Inc., Meriden, CT, USA; Connecticut Lifestyle Medicine, CT, USA (DP)Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, CT, USA
Padmaja M. Patel, Lifestyle Medicine Center, Midland Health, Midland, TX, USA
Karen R. Studer, Preventive Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
Micaela C. Karlsen, Department of Research, American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO, USA; Departments of Applied Nutrition and Global Public Health, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, USA
Abstract
Identify areas of consensus on integrating lifestyle medicine (LM) into primary care to achieve optimal outcomes. Methods: Experts in both LM and primary care followed an a priori protocol for developing consensus statements. Using an iterative, online process, panel members expressed levels of agreement with statements, resulting in classification as consensus, near consensus, or no consensus. Results: The panel identified 124 candidate statements addressing: (1) Integration into Primary Care, (2) Delivery Models, (3) Provider Education, (4) Evidence-base for LM, (5) Vital Signs, (6) Treatment, (7) Resource Referral and Reimbursement, (8) Patient, Family, and Community Involvement; Shared Decision-Making, (9) Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity, and (10) Barriers to LM. After three iterations of an online Delphi survey, statement revisions, and removal of duplicative statements, 65 statements met criteria for consensus, 24 for near consensus, and 35 for no consensus. Consensus was reached on key topics that included LM being recognized as an essential component of primary care in patients of all ages, including LM as a foundational element of health professional education. Conclusion: The practice of LM in primary care can be strengthened by applying these statements to improve quality of care, inform policy, and identify areas for future research.
DOI
10.1177/15598276231202970
Recommended Citation
Grega ML, Shalz JT, Rosenfeld RM, et al. American College of Lifestyle Medicine Expert Consensus Statement: Lifestyle Medicine for Optimal Outcomes in Primary Care. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2023;18(2):269-293. doi:10.1177/15598276231202970